Instead of being a paid petitioner? paulie claims to be dedicated to the Libertarian party. And the libertarian cause/movement. His raison d’etre is his petitioning work. His employment. His expertise.
Clearly paulie is IT talented. This begs the question: Wouldn’t paulie’s IT talent better serve the LP if he was working for the LP AS A IT TECH? Granted, petitioning is not as simple as it sounds. But others could do it besides paulie. And is pays fairly well. But I wouldn’t think as well as an IT tech.
What is wrong with this picture? Why does everyone unquestioningly accept paulie?
Why doesn’t he own a laptop or have internet access in his own name? Maybe he can’t. Maybe there is some reason he can’t, like a court order or condition for probation or parole. Or plea bargain or Rule 35 sentencing. etc. Everybody seems to accept his claim to poverty in the face of his possible well paying IT job/career. Why.
He claims to be a left libertarian interested in outreach to the left. Well, Ivam an ideal candidate for libertarian outreach to the progressive left. Yet I get little especially from paulie. In fact the exact opposite, ridicule. And, IF he was Anonymous, banning from commenting in IPR. That is a great accomplishment for the reactionaries-to deprive me of a significant forum. Why would he do that-or at least acquiesce to it?
When is somebody going to do something about this situation between paulie and me? Somebody other than WSS who isn’t behaving like WSS anymore.